![]() ![]() Hours after the attack, however, copies of the gruesome video continued to appear on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, raising new questions about the companies’ ability to manage harmful content on their platforms.įacebook is “removing any praise or support for the crime and the shooter or shooters as soon as we’re aware,” Garlick said. In 2019, a gunman attacked mosques in New Zealands Christchurch. ![]() ![]() “New Zealand Police alerted us to a video on Facebook shortly after the livestream commenced and we quickly removed both the shooter’s Facebook and Instagram accounts and the video,” Mia Garlick, Facebook’s director of policy for Australia and New Zealand, said in a statement. Christchurch Shooting Video LiveleakThe Christchurch attack showed up online on the. One of the attackers appears to have livestreamed his actions on Facebook, forcing the company to answer for its role in the tragedy. Two gunmen separately attacked mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, killing dozens of people. The inability to control and moderate social media platforms was highlighted by a tragic shooting in New Zealand. Tech companies seem to have few answers for censoring violent speech online. This article originally ran in 2019 and is part of our annual countdown of the most-viewed stories from PR Daily. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |